According to the assessment of Swedish experts, the plan of the future landfill as a whole looks normal. But during the blog tour they could not get acquainted with the technology and a detailed plan, a description of the project.
"Of course, taking out waste so far just to make a landfill is not the best idea for the environment, and it is very expensive. Transportation of waste to the place where you have a plant for processing or incineration, can still be
justified," says Ingrid. "In Sweden, there are still functioning landfills, but there are no mixed waste, which will be brought to Shies. Sweden landfills are used exclusively for wastes such as asbestos and other construction waste that
cannot be recycled. Garbage is sorted where it appears. Some goes for recycling, some for incineration. We are good at this."
Incineration, according to Ingrid, is better than landfills. By disposing of the waste in this way,
it is possible to reduce the volume, remove organic garbage, as it is converted into energy, which can be used to heat entire areas. Disadvantage of burning is the formation of harmful ash. Sweden takes it to landfills in neighboring Norway.
Polygons for organic waste are prohibited, as methane appears during the decomposition of organic waste. If it is not collected and burned for additional thermal energy, it is a threat to the environment, because it affects
the climate more than carbon dioxide. For organic garbage, except for incineration, there is anaerobic processing — the decomposition of organic substances without oxygen. With this method, you can get fertilizer and biogas, which is also
used as fuel. If you use the anaerobic method, then you should do it where the garbage is collected. Subsequently, it is difficult to sort, and the quality deteriorates. All dangerous garbage (batteries or lamps) is always collected separately.